Small camera
Still looking for suggestions (http://www.thephotoforum.com/forum/showpost.php?p=595917&postcount=24)
Still looking for suggestions (http://www.thephotoforum.com/forum/showpost.php?p=595917&postcount=24)
Canon, Samsung and Olympus have tiny cams too. Like Innocence says: check http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/specs.asp. Or http://www.steves-digicams.com/hardware_reviews.html.
Once you start cropping and editing, you lose pixels annoyingly fast. So if you're into that it's better to have exposures with as many pixels as possible before you start the editing. This on the basis of the (wrong) assumption that if you have many pixels to begin with, you can more easily afford to lose some.
Anyway, this fall 2006 that would mean you should look at 10mp cameras. There's a whole crop of those. Both in Point & Shoot cams as in dSLR's.
Those big megapixel files have a considerable downside though: your PC must schlepp those ginormous files around and crunch 'm when editing, rendering and displaying. You need a serious PC for that! Better still, a Mac of course ;–) Most likely your current PC will slow down to a crawl with files like that tumbling through Photoshop....
Canon, Samsung and Olympus have tiny cams too. Like Innocence says: check http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/specs.asp. Or http://www.steves-digicams.com/hardware_reviews.html.
sorry i'm not too knowledgeble!
Still looking for suggestions (http://www.thephotoforum.com/forum/showpost.php?p=595917&postcount=24)
My Yahoo Group (http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/coolsitesguy/)
However It didn't take we long to start wanting more. Now I own a canon 20D, after I realzed that size didn't really matter to me as much as taking good photos whithin reason. Basically just remember that with point and shoot cameras you are stuck with one lense.
you have given me some thing to think about.
I am still looking for suggestions on this. (http://www.thephotoforum.com/forum/showpost.php?p=595917&postcount=24)
Still looking for help with this (http://www.thephotoforum.com/forum/showpost.php?p=595917&postcount=24)
However It didn't take we long to start wanting more. Now I own a canon 20D, after I realzed that size didn't really matter to me as much as taking good photos whithin reason. Basically just remember that with point and shoot cameras you are stuck with one lense.
Go to your best but or if you're lucky photography shops and take a few snapshots and see how the look.
I'd reccomend since we're up and caught up with technological advances, keeping it above 5.0MP is safe proof for some good quality pictures.
Keep in mind the photographer is what makes the art, just that...art.
You can have the most expensive and best quality cam, but if you stink at photography it's worthless.
Thinking also the sony dsc-N2
Still Looking for suggestions on this (http://www.thephotoforum.com/forum/showpost.php?p=595917&postcount=24)
My yahoo group (http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/coolsitesguy/)
Which one?
Still looking for suggestions (http://www.thephotoforum.com/forum/showpost.php?p=595917&postcount=24)
My yahoo group (http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/coolsitesguy/)
They can get pretty small. My wife uses a Sony digital cam that is about the size of a short stack of business cards. She can put it in her purse and forget it is there. The images it makes are just fine and I print 8 1/2 X 11's for her whenever she wants them. It is about a year old and has 4 mp I think. It doesn't take a sophisticated camera to make good images. It takes a sophisticated eye.
#If you have any other info about this subject , Please add it free.# |